Bridget Phillipson says failing schools could still be forced to become academies despite Ofsted giving up single-word ratings
Here is the news release from the Department for Education about the removal of single-word verdicts on schools in England from Ofsted.
In interviews this morning, Bridget Phillipson, the education secretary, explained that Ofsted reports issued during the new academic year will still use the current single or two-word verdicts (outstanding, good, requires improvement, and inadequate) across the four categories covered by its inspections: quality of education; behaviour and attitudes; personal development; and leadership and management. But schools won’t get a single-word verdict applying to performance overall.
And from September 2025 a new report card system for schools will be introduced.
Phillipson said the change announced today will not stop her intervening if schools are failing, and she said she would retain the power to turn a failing school into an academy. She told the Today programme:
I want to make sure that we drive up standards, that we make sure schools are getting the support that they need to make improvement.
I won’t hesitate to take action if schools are not making that improvement because our children only get one chance when they’re at school, one chance, and we have to get that right.
Asked whether an inadequate judgment in the sub-categories could lead to a school being forced to become an academy, Phillipson replied:
It can do, or it could involve support being put in place. I retain the power to issue an order to convert that school into an academy.
Key events
In her Today programme interview Amanda Spielman, the former Ofsted chief inspector, said she thought today’s announcement about the end of single-word verdicts for schools in England implied short Ofsted inspections will end. She explained:
The other thing that I think is implied by this announcement is that the short, ungraded inspections that were all government would fund Ofsted to do for most schools will be scrapped so that it can do a full set of judgments in every inspection.
Here is a clip from the interview.
Former Ofsted chief inspector Amanda Spielman says scrapping the one-word rating ‘is not about changing the wording of judgements’ and shouldn’t be about ‘putting the interests of schools and their staff ahead of children’.#R4Today
— BBC Radio 4 Today (@BBCr4today) September 2, 2024
Former Ofsted chief welcomes abolition of single-word school ratings, saying old system ‘more of problem than help’
Good morning. The summer recess is over, parliament is back, the newish Labour government is still in its hyperactive ‘early days’ stage (although no one is using the word honeymoon any more) and Keir Starmer is celebrating his 62nd birthday by making a visit to publicise the government’s announcement about the abolition of single-word Ofsted verdicts for schools in England.
This is a policy proposed in Labour’s manifesto, and it has been warmly welcomed by teaching unions who have long complained that single-word judgments were too crude. Pressure for their removal intensified after Ruth Perry, a primary school head, killed herself after learning that her school was going to be downgraded from outstanding (the best of four grades) to inadequate (the worst), even though Ofsted said it was giving pupils a good education, because of safeguarding errors.
Pippa Crerar’s overnight story about the announcement is here.
This morning Amanda Spielman, who was appointed to run Ofsted when the Conservatives were in office and who served for seven years until December last year, welcomed the change. In an interview with the Today programme, she said that although parents liked the simplicity of one-word Ofsted judgments, the system was flawed because the overall one-word assessments were too powerful. For example, schools rated inadequate had to become academies if they weren’t acadamies already. Spielman told the Today programme:
[The previous government] wouldn’t acknowledge that fear of inspection overwhelmingly related to the fear of consequences. I listened a lot to the sector. I knew that. So this a very interesting switch … I think this is beneficial for inspection, I think it’s beneficial for schools. I think it’s beneficial for parents and children …
When you survey parents, generally, they like the simplicity and clarity [of one-word judgments]. Various surveys have showed stronger support from parents for models with overall effectiveness judgments. But, nevertheless, because of the weight of consequences that government had hung on them, they had become more of a problem than a help.
I will post more from Spielman’s interview, and from the interviews the education secretary Bridget Phillipson has been giving, shortly.
The Conservative leadership contest is warming up this week. Kemi Badenoch, who is generally seen as the favourite, is giving a speech this morning and, as Harry Taylor reports, she has also given up one-word assessments. She has got a three-word verdict on the Labour government – “clueless, irresponsible and dishonest”.
Guardian readers can probably think of another recent government which might deserve this label much more.
Here is the agenda for the day.
Morning: Keir Starmer is visiting a school in London, where he will do a pooled TV interview.
10.30am: Kemi Badenoch formally launches her campaign for the Conservative leadership.
11am: The campaign group More in Common holds a briefing on research into what people who voted Tory in 2019 think about the current leadership candidates.
11.30am: Downing Street holds a lobby briefing.
12.10pm: James Cleverly, another Tory leadership candidate, gives a speech.
2.30pm: Angela Rayner, the housing secretary and deputy prime minister, takes questions in the Commons.
We will probably get various statements and/or urgent questions at 3.30pm too, but they have not been announced yet.
If you want to contact me, please post a message below the line (BTL) or message me on social media. I can’t read all the messages BTL, but if you put “Andrew” in a message aimed at me, I am more likely to see it because I search for posts containing that word.
If you want to flag something up urgently, it is best to use social media. I’m still using X and I’ll see something addressed to @AndrewSparrow very quickly. I’m also trying Bluesky (@andrewsparrowgdn) and Threads (@andrewsparrowtheguardian).
I find it very helpful when readers point out mistakes, even minor typos (no error is too small to correct). And I find your questions very interesting too. I can’t promise to reply to them all, but I will try to reply to as many as I can, either BTL or sometimes in the blog.